|
Patent Special Master
Are you a Judge or a party to patent litigation seeking a Special Master for your patent case? Mediator Do you need a Private Mediator for your case? Litigation and Counseling Are you a patent owner seeking to enforce your rights? Are you accused of, or being sued for, patent infringement? Counsel to Law Firms Do you need assistance representing a client in an intellectual property dispute? Are you seeking Local Counsel in one of the New York Federal Courts? |
At The Rando Law Firm we offer complete legal services to secure and enforce the rights of our clients in all intellectual property and complex business matters.
Personal attention, a strong technical and scientific knowledge base, and straightforward legal guidance are the hallmarks of our representation. Mr. Rando’s experience, which includes twenty-five years of handling complex federal civil litigation matters in the areas of patents, trademarks, copyrights, antitrust, and other business related disputes, combined with appointment as a special master presiding over numerous patent cases, provides you with his unique skill-set, perspective and insight for all of your IP legal challenges. THE NEW YORK FEDERAL COURTHOUSES
|
RECENT NEWS AND PUBLICATIONSNantkwest v. Matal:
ARTICLE III DISTRICT COURT CHALLENGES TO USPTO DETERMINATIONS: ATTORNEYS FEES AT WHOSE “EXPENSE”? On Tuesday, January 23, 2018, The Association of Amicus Counsel filed an amicus brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal, arguing that attorneys' fees are not part of "All the expenses of the proceedings" which "shall be paid by the applicant" under 35 U.S.C. 145, Article III District Court challenges to USPTO determinations. - Rob Rando, Co-Counsel. ___________________________________ OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. GREENE’S ENERGY GROUP, LLC: PATENT RIGHTS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE AND WHOSE THOUGHTS AND IDEAS ARE THEY ANYWAY? On Thursday, August 31, 2017, The Association of Amicus Counsel filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC. arguing that inter partes review ("IPR"), an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to analyze the validity of existing patents, violates the Constitution by extinguishing private property rights through a non-Article III forum without a jury. - Rob Rando, Counsel of Record. ___________________________________ America’s Need For Strong, Stable and Sound Intellectual Property Protection and Policies: Why It Really Matters “There is a Chinese curse which says ‘May he live in interesting times.’ Like it or not we live in interesting times. They are times of danger and uncertainty; but they are also more open to the creative energy of men than any other time in history.” —Senator Robert F. Kennedy |